Monday, April 23, 2012

Decision that tickled my @$#


On 20th February 2012, I get a mail from AP-INTACT- an email-based network group of anti-corruption practitioners from all across the world, publicly announcing of an opening for a scholarship program at the International Anti-Corruption Academy (IACA) at Laxenburg, Austria.  For me, more than the training content, it was the number of anti-corruption practitioners who will be gathering there for this program (70 from all across the world) that captured my imagination. “Wow! What a pool of resources” I said to myself.  ---Such is the opportunity.

“Dear Friends,
I trust this mail finds you well.  The International Anti-Corruption Academy in Laxenburg, Austria, is inviting new applications for its 2012 summer school. Interested friends can find details and apply online here.”

On 2nd March 2012, I informed this matter to Mr. A. K Rinzin, Chief of the Education Division and decided to apply for this program. But wait! You better inform the Commission about it even though there is no guarantee that you will get through the selection process. On the same day, Mr. A.K wrote to HR Officer requesting her to put up the matter during the upcoming HRC meeting.

“Dear Pasang,
Please find attached herewith the information regarding the upcoming program at the International Anti-corruption Summer Academy. Loday and I will apply………………and that is the reason I am forwarding this to you. Please put it up to the next HRC.
-  A Karma Rinzin”

Considering silence as acceptance, on 14 March 2012, I submitted my application online- a day before the submission deadline. -Such is the aspiration. 

On 13th April 2012, I get a mail from IACA informing me of my admittance to the International Anti-Corruption Summer Academy with an IACSA Scholarship. They have not only accepted my candidature but also agreed to fund me in full. –Such is the luck.

“Dear Mr. Tsheten,

It is a great pleasure for us to inform you that the IACSA Selection Board has admitted you to the International Anti-Corruption Summer Academy with an IACSA Scholarship. This years´ Summer Academy will take place in Laxenburg, Austria, from 5 to 14 July 2012 at the premises of the International Anti-Corruption Academy (IACA).

In order to process your admission, please confirm your attendance by e-mail before 24 April 2012, 12:00 CET. Please confirm also that you agree with the Declaration of Consent for IACSA Scholarship Holders at the International Anti-Corruption Summer.”

On 18th April 2012, the matter was put before the HRC for onward recommendation to the Commission-the final approving authority to my two ways ticket to Austria. The following is the minutes of the meeting.

“DCPO informed the HRC that Mr. Loday has applied for scholarship to participate in the summer academy organized by IACA and had received his acceptance letter. It was learned that AK had sent an email to HRO regarding the scholarship. In the mean time he went ahead with application for the scholarship. The members agreed that before applying for the course, the same should have been routed through the HRC. One of the members felt that though there was some procedural violation yet if the course content was useful and relevant, the violation could be excused. And exception could be made considering the relevance of the course. However, majority felt that nomination process was violated and any consideration will create precedence, which may lead to adhocism and derail planned HR implementation.”

If the above minutes of the meeting is anything to go by Mr. Loday Tsheten is accused of procedural violation, setting precedence, creating adhocism and finally derailing the planned HR implementation.

while it’s always nice to be accused of something, somewhere, sometimes, the manner and the wisdom with which such accusations are made calls for serious sole-searching.  I am still wondering as to how and why I might be accused of procedural violation if I have already informed the concerned official prior to my application? Was it right to victimize someone for the inefficacy of another?  –Such is the wisdom and rationale that supports decision-making in an organization that aspires to be the best.

And on 23rd April 2012, a day before the deadline to confirm my participation, I get the final decision from the authority.

“As a senior officer who is fully aware of HR policy and procedure and who has operated as HR member, such oversight of procedure is not acceptable. Despite the scholarship, participation is not approved. This sets an unhealthy trend.”

Fully respecting all the wisdom behind the decisions and of course, adamantly dejecting all the allegations put against, Loday Tsheten wrote to IACA. 

“Dear Sir/Mam,

Thank you very much for your kind consideration. However, I regret to inform you that I cannot make it to the upcoming summer academy program to be held in July this year due to unavoidable circumstances.

Thank you once again and with best wishes,

Loday Tsheten
Bhutan”




  

1 comment:

  1. It is so ironical. Anyway it is good on your part to look at life through rose tinted glasses.

    ReplyDelete